As a follow-up to a previous post looking at the differences in sharpness between a zoom and primes on my Fuji X-T1, I used a similar set up to see how the 18-56mm zoom on my Leica T (Typ 710) compared to the Fuji X-T1 + 23mm and 56mm primes
As you can see the results are, in terms of sharpness, very similar. In fact if you discard the different colour balance it would seem as if the same lens was used. This leads to a situation where both manufacturers could legitimately claim credit. Leica for producing a 'kit' zoom that compares well with two very highly regarded prime lenses and Fuji for producing lenses that are the equal of Leica.
I would point out that all of the above comparison shots were processed from raw using Iridient Developer. I used the same settings for all camera / lens combinations to get consistent results. This was the Fuji X-T1 defaults in the software. There is a set of defaults for the Leica, but I kept it the same for both. I did this because of the issues about using Adobe raw conversion (Photoshop and Lightroom) for the Fuji X files. If I had used Photoshop then the Leica, with it's .DNG raw files, would have appeared to be slightly sharper.
The similarity is interesting and before I did the test I really had no preconceptions about what the results might be. The Leica zoom is the best 'standard' zoom I've ever used (as indeed it should be for the price!) but then those Fuji primes are pretty special too. In fact the zoom / prime choice in this case is only a difference in terms of the 'speed' of the lenses and the Fuji's with their wide apertures have the advantage there.
This is the second time I've done a Leica T > Fuji X comparison. In a previous post I compared the T + zoom to my Fuji X100s.
In that comparison the Leica produced the sharper results and the post also pointed out the distortion problems with the Fuji lens.
I've written a couple of times that, as far as I'm concerned, the Leica T system is shaping up to be the 'best' mirrorless system. I suspect that I'm very much in a minority here and I am well aware that Leica have some catching up to do on the lens front. However in terms of image quality, size, handling and the simplicity of operation, for me Leica have got this seriously right.
I still think that a mirrorless / CSC / E.V.I.L system should offer something different to a DSLR. While I'm very impressed by the Fuji X-T1, the Sony FE cameras and the GH4 / E-M1 options from m4/3, these are pretty much, in terms of everything apart from the mirror, slightly scaled down DSLR's in appearance and use. And that's OK, but I still like the rangefinder influenced body shape of cameras like the Leica T, The Fuji X100 series and cameras like the Panasonic GX7.
The current retro influenced camera fashion has changed recently, from that rangefinder 'lookaleica' style to the small DSLR, as embodied by Fuji and Olympus and that does have an appeal for me, but the Leica T (Typ 701) is a modern slant on that rangefinder aesthetic, which I really love. It IS my favourite camera and I won't be naive and attempt to assert that red logo on the front isn't a factor in that, but then often the label on something and the ownership of that label can give us pleasure. Materialistic maybe, but how many of us can claim to be totally immune from that.
SUPPORT THIS SITE.
As a full-time photographer I make my living from selling images on Stock Photography sites. Writing this blog and doing the comparison tests takes time away from that and earns me very little. If you find what you read here of interest, then you can help me to fund the gear I buy to review, by clicking on the adsense banners, donating and / or buying your gear from the affiliate links. You don't pay any extra, I get a small commission.
Previously I was posting on the free, Blogger platform, but this site, with it's greatly increased functionality, costs me money and the more it expands, the more it will cost. If I can get THE SOUNDIMAGEPLUS BLOG economically viable, then I will be able to review a lot more gear and extend and expand those reviews. Running a blog these days that competes with the best out there requires a lot of time and effort and is close to a full-time job. This means that I'm neglecting other work to put that time in. It is my intention to turn this into a much more comprehensive review and user experience site and I can only do that if I can get it to generate more income.
This site, like much of the internet, has free content and like much of the internet is funded by advertising and donations. I realise that not everybody likes advertising, but without it many of our favourite sites would have to resort to charging for what they do. Google, Facebook and all the other social networks sites remain free because of that advertising.
There is an interesting article on the BBC website HERE, which deals with many of the issues above.