Now I'm not going to pretend that my Samsung Galaxy 2 Camera has the best image quality. In fact it's not that great when viewed at 100% on my monitor. There's not a lot I can do about it either since it shoots jpgs. only. It is however one of the most useful cameras I have with it's fantastic zoom range, very small footprint and it really is a carry anywhere camera.
The point is that I'm never going to be carrying around a camera and lenses that give me that 23-483mm (35mm 'equivalent') range, so the pictures above that i took with it wouldn't exist anyway if I didn't have it.
My picture libraries accept the images it creates, I sell pictures shot with it and images print better than they look on a screen anyway. So that old dilemma of convenience versus quality is partly taken care of. And the fact that I really like using it makes a huge difference.
It has a large view screen, though somewhat less sharp and bright than my Nokia 1020 and has decent image stabilisation, so that long telephoto end is very useable. It's one of those cameras that prove that the pictures are more important than the gear and the very fact that the sensor is so small makes the size and zoom range range possible, so it's a common trade off. Now I'm not prepared to do that trade all the time, but for situations when I'm walking a fair distance it comes in very useful. It's also a great camera for cycling.
One day in the future we might get cameras this size that produce images that rival those of much bigger sensors, but that's still some way off. In the meantime a camera that cost me £250 is one that gives me pleasure to use and produces pictures I find aesthetically pleasing. And ultimately that's a pretty good reason to own and use it.
SUPPORT THIS SITE.
As a full-time photographer I make my living from selling images on Stock Photography sites. Writing this blog and doing the comparison tests takes time away from that and earns me very little. If you find what you read here of interest, then you can help me to fund the gear I buy to review, by clicking on the adsense banners, donating and / or buying your gear from the affiliate links. You don't pay any extra, I get a small commission.
Previously I was posting on the free, Blogger platform, but this site, with it's greatly increased functionality, costs me money and the more it expands, the more it will cost. If I can get THE SOUNDIMAGEPLUS BLOG economically viable, then I will be able to review a lot more gear and extend and expand those reviews. Running a blog these days that competes with the best out there requires a lot of time and effort and is close to a full-time job. This means that I'm neglecting other work to put that time in. It is my intention to turn this into a much more comprehensive review and user experience site and I can only do that if I can get it to generate more income.
This site, like much of the internet, has free content and like much of the internet is funded by advertising and donations. I realise that not everybody likes advertising, but without it many of our favourite sites would have to resort to charging for what they do. Google, Facebook and all the other social networks sites remain free because of that advertising.
There is an interesting article on the BBC website HERE, which deals with many of the issues above.