OLYMPUS OM-D E-M10 at ISO 6400

In yesterdays post I showed just how good the Olympus OM-D E-M10 was at high ISO settings. I'm including some more samples shot at ISO 6400 in low indoor light.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus M.ZUIKO 45mm f1.8 lens

Again I think this is very impressive and better than I was expecting. By shooting raw and doing my own noise reduction in Photoshop I can get slightly better results. However the OOC jpgs. are also excellent. This of course widens the possibilities for the use of this camera in many more situations than would normally be expected for a m4/3 camera. 

What's most interesting is this isn't just a better way of noise reducing jpgs., because the raw files show a much lower level of noise than 4/3 sensors are known for. Plus there is excellent detail rendering also, without the smearing or destruction of detail that has happened previously. So why is this now the case? Well I can't say for sure, but the fact that lots of R&D is being undertaken to get the very small sensors in smartphones to perform better probably has a lot to do with it. 

Anyway, whatever the reason, m4/3 users can now rightly claim that the latest sensors can get pretty close to the performance of their APS-C counterparts at ALL ISO settings. And certainly, it's made me have a bit of a rethink about what I want to keep and which systems I want to expand. To that end I'm picking up an Olympus 25mm f/1.8 today and one of my first tests is to put it up against my Nikon Df + Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART lens, just to see what the differences are.

SUPPORT THIS SITE.

As a full-time photographer I make my living from selling images on Stock Photography sites. Writing this blog and doing the comparison tests takes time away from that and earns me very little. If you find what you read here of interest, then you can help me to fund the gear I buy to review, by clicking on the adsense banners, donating and / or buying your gear from the affiliate links. You don't pay any extra, I get a small commission. 

Previously I was posting on the free, Blogger platform, but this site, with it's greatly increased functionality, costs me money and the more it expands, the more it will cost.  If I can get THE SOUNDIMAGEPLUS BLOG economically viable, then I will be able to review a lot more gear and extend and expand those reviews. Running a blog these days that competes with the best out there requires a lot of time and effort and is close to a full-time job. This means that I'm neglecting other work to put that time in. It is my intention to turn this into a much more comprehensive review and user experience site and I can only do that if I can get it to generate more income. 

This site, like much of the internet, has free content and like much of the internet is funded by advertising and donations. I realise that not everybody likes advertising, but without it many of our favourite sites would have to resort to charging for what they do. Google, Facebook and all the other social networks sites remain free because of that advertising. I try to make the ads as unobtrusive as possible and I certainly won't be installing any of those annoying 'flickering' or video boxes. Below are some links to Amazon products relevant to each post and I will continue to put them at the end of the articles. 

There is an interesting article on the BBC website HERE, which deals with many of the issues above.

Many Thanks

David Taylor-Hughes

Donate via Paypal