Well, sensor technology actually doesn't get stuck in the mud and there will be improvements in the future, of that there is no doubt. What Sony can achieve with their 1" sensor is remarkable, and to be honest I wouldn't mind if m4/3 had a sensor that performed like that with good results at low ISO's and getting worse the higher you go. But both Olympus and Panasonic seem determined to produce good 'all-round' cameras and both with their latest model seem to be targeting a much higher end market of enthusiasts, serious amateurs and professionals. I just wonder though how far this can go. There would need to be a radical improvement in sensor performance for m4/3 to significantly increase pixel density while still retaining the current all round performance. And of course if such technology exists then APS-C and 35mm / 'Full-Frame' can also take advantage of that.
To a certain extent however it doesn't matter that much. I'm currently upsizing my m4/3 files to 21MP, almost the size of the maximum that Canon currently offer. And with my new ACR preset they look great, are capable of high-level large-scale reproduction and most importantly for me, they sell well. So to a certain extent that image quality is already in the files and with very careful exposure and processing it can be accessed. As I indicated in a previous post, I am now selling quite a few images with very large file sizes, which is a fairly recent phenomenon. I have no idea what these are being used for so can't really comment on why this might be.
But far from the vast majority of my work being bought for use only on the internet it's obvious that printed publication is still where many of my images end up. And can m4/3 cope with that? Well yes I think it can. And despite not being convinced that under current conditions the sensors in these cameras can go much further in terms of MP size, without loosing the quality that has been patiently built up, there are enough good reasons for me to carry on with the format, the excellent lens range, the genuinely small and light footprint of the entire system and the overall real class of the system being the prime attractions. And it is still my favourite system overall.
So in conclusion, though I may well be selling my GH3 the GX7 will be around for a while I think. That's not as definite as the fact that I'm keeping the A7 but I enjoy using the GX7 an awful lot and while that doesn't mean that I will end up keeping it, it does go a long way towards influencing my decision. It can't match what my Sony A7r + newly-acquired 55mm f/1.8 can offer but it has it's virtues and I know if I sold all my m4/3 gear I'd only buy some more in the future so it's a provisional tick for the GX7.
So only my two Fuji's to think about now.
For my series on Mirrorless Choices - Click this link
LINKS AND SOCIAL MEDIA
For commenting, discussion, posting your pictures, links and articles - join the Soundimageplus Blog Readers Group on Google+
follow by email
follow on twitter
follow on facebook
follow on 500px
follow on pinterest
soundimageplus blog readers pictures group on flickr
soundimageplus on YouTube
soundimageplus on Vimeo
shutterstock portfolio istockphoto porfolio