I've got nothing against the E-M1. I'm sure it's a fine camera, not for me because of several important omissions, but one of the best mirrorless offerings ever that's for sure. But anyone who's looked at image samples from it can clearly see that it suffers from the usual m4/3 deficiencies, low pixel count compared to the best of the competition, poor high ISO performance, luminance noise present even at base ISO and without very careful processing, restricted dynamic range. Plus when compared to samples from the Sony A7 and A7r, which exhibit none of the above it's not the E-M1 that 'trounces' it's competitors but rather the reverse. And anyone who argues that the m4/3 camera is superior in image quality to the Sony FE's is either a deluded fanboy with an eye test overdue, a fool or has a financial incentive to promote that point of view. And as I said in a previous post, go check out some samples, there's plenty about.
OK so finally before I move on to something else, some examples of just how m4/3 'trounces' the A7r (or not)
All original material on this blog is © Soundimageplus
N.B. to see more on the cameras and lenses featured in this post click on the relevant labels (tags and keywords) at the bottom of this post.
For comment and discussion join the Soundimageplus Blog Readers Group at Google+