I've also been working with two other combinations, both with the Fuji X-E1. There is good and bad news on these. The first is with my Nikon 55-200mm zoom, via a Kipon adapter.
This was much easier to focus and the results were very high quality. The images were very sharp and I would think equally as good as the Fuji 35mm prime. However this focal length is duplicated by my 18-55mm Fuji zoom and the only reason to use it in preference to that is if I wanted a faster lens.
So some different lens / camera combinations over the past few days. The Fuji / Nikon combinations won't get used a lot and my hopes for a light telephoto option with the 55-200mm didn't actually work in practice. There is the Fuji zoom apparently coming in May, but it is substantially heavier, so I was hoping that the Nikon alternative would work. However the difficulties of focusing it have made me virtually rule it out as an option.
One other thing I should mention, is what do Fuji (and also Panasonic and Olympus) have against focus peaking? Do they actively want to discourage manual focusing? Because I can't think of any other reason why its not included. Its technology that has been around in video cameras for a long time and I can't imagine that its either difficult to include or particularly expensive, so why isn't it included in the Fuji X-series or m4/3 cameras? Fuji have some rangefinder like arrangement on the X100s, which since its a fixed lens camera with AF strikes me as somewhat superfluous. It would be really useful on the X-Pro 1 and X-E1 and its certainly something that people in the forums have been calling for, as indeed they have with m4/3 cameras. There is obviously some reluctance to include this and I'm not sure I have even a guess as to why its not there. It would make using MF lenses much easier. I live in hope.
Finally I processed these Fuji files using the latest official ACR in Photoshop CS6. 7.4. It is supposed to have marginally improved performace with Fuji X-Trans files and Dpreview described it as 'the differences are very subtle'. Well they are too subtle for me. Either my pixel-peeping skills are diminishing or there isn't any difference at all. If there is I can't see it.
All original material on this blog is © Soundimageplus.
To comment join the Soundimageplus Blog Readers Group at Google+
For discussion - join me over at Google+