I then save this version as a TIFF, making sure that there is no sharpening applied to the files.
Photoshop CS6 then lets me open that TIFF file in Adobe Camera Raw 7.
At the present time this is the closest that I can get to a raw file that opens up in a more sophisticated raw converter. It means that I can work with a lossless file and I certainly can get better results than just working on TIFF files in Photoshop. The main reason I like this is that I can use the ACR sharpening parameters. Firstly I like them better than what Silkypix uses, Secondly, I'm used to working with them, so finally I have some idea of what I can get from these X-Pro 1 files.
The first thing to say is that if you think you can get sharp clean images from either the jpgs. or the Silkypix conversions, then you will be amazed at what this can produce.
The "Super Neutral" TIFF is quite low contrast and not bitingly sharp.
However, by running the TIFF file through ACR 7, I'm able to get something thats closer to what I would expect these files to produce.
This is crisper, with a lot better contrast. Now, maybe I could get results similar to this in Silkypix, but so far I've been unable to work out how to do that. The sharpening parameters, in particular, seem a little crude to me, and apart from anything else, this is easier and quicker for me as I know how to get the results I want in Photoshop.
It is important to say that occasionally some of the highlights burn out using this Super Neutral setting and I've found that its a good idea to make sure that the highlight controller dynamic range expansion slider is set to maximum. Plus I also take the exposure down 1/2 stop. The images go a little dark, but this works better when transferring the tiff files into Adobe camera raw 7. See screen grab below.
Finally I would say, that now I have some way of (more or less) being able to compare the X-Pro 1 files with every other camera I've used, my impression is that these files are capable of astounding resolution and sharpness. The above Photoshopped file is a 100% blowup, and it looks pretty good to me. I'm not going to say the name, but very reminiscent of a certain German, hand-built camera of my recent aquaintance.
As to the speed issue. I have been whingeing on about the speed of this camera, but yesterday gave me the opportunity to use it as a seriously fast camera. Using a NIKON 28mm f/2.8 lens, set to f11 at ISO 200, and focused on infinity (or using zone focusing / hyperfocal distance), I was able to take these shots as if I was using a point and shoot camera. When the X-Pro 1 doesn't have to focus a lens, the shutter is actually pretty quick. It is of course the way that photographers have used certain hand built German cameras in the past for street photography. Wide-angle lenses and zone focusing have served the Magnum agency well down the years.
So the X-Pro 1 CAN be a fast camera under certain circumstances, but it does require the right lens, the right adapter and the right light, as far as I'm concerned. However since images like the following are typical of what I take, then its a handy solution.
For comment and discussion - join us over at Google+
soundimageplus website - http://web.me.com/davidmartynhughes/Site/home.html
follow on twitter - http://twitter.com/#!/soundimageplus
follow on facebook - http://www.facebook.com/soundimageplus
soundimageplus on flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/45203414@N06/
soundimageplus blog readers pictures group - http://www.flickr.com/groups/1705334@N24/
soundimageplus on YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/user/soundimageplus
soundimageplus on Vimeo - http://vimeo.com/user1050904/video